|
Earlier Dr. John Reczek proudly showed off the pigment ink technology used in the new system. We've reported on this extensively, beginning with the product introduction announcements (http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRINT/KAO/KAO.htm), because it's really the key to the system. Without these inks, there wouldn't be a Kodak inkjet. So we'll summarize here.
They are pigments not dyes, to begin with. But they are unlike other pigments because they are quite small. Kodak drew on pigment grinding patents going back to its X-ray film emulsion technology to develop its miniscule 20 nanometer ink pigments with polymer binders. The X-ray project was an attempt to replace a dye interlayer designed to prevent color contamination that scattered too much light with a pigment layer that would scatter less light and therefore avoid losing sharpness.
The exceptionally small size of the pigments provides two key benefits, John told us. First, because they scatter less light, they provide a larger gamut than normal size pigments. Second, they increase printhead reliability, clogging the nozzles less frequently.
The color gamut issue is a confusing one. Kodak actually claims their pigment set has a larger gamut than dye-based ink sets, not just other pigments. But in our tests back at the bunker, Canon's dyes exceeded the Kodak pigment gamut, as we reported in our 5300 review (http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRINT/K5300/K5300.HTM). We asked John about that.
The Canon print, he pointed out, has the advantage of having been made with a high fidelity ink set. While the Kodak print relied on a set of just three color inks plus black, the Canon had the advantage of a set of eight inks. As a former pressman, I can vouch for that explanation. And in fact, when you compare the output of an HP three-ink print like those from the A626 we reviewed (http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRINT/HPA626/HPA626.HTM) to the Kodak prints, the Kodak has deeper shadows and more contrast. No doubt using a black ink helps Kodak here, too.
The smaller particles also improve gloss performance, John said. In fact, the clear ink in the color cartridge is not a gloss optimizer (as you might find in an Epson inkset). Instead, it's a polymer coating that is designed to seal the ink in the porous papers Kodak uses. Kodak's papers are not the swellable sheets typically used with dye-based inks to encapsulate the dye in a gelatin layer. They are porous sheets that suck in the liquid vehicle that delivers the pigments to the surface of the sheet. The clear coat seals those pigments on the paper and provides instant-dry handling. That slight tackiness you feel when you touch a print fresh from the printer is that coating. It extends over the full width of the image, we noted, regardless of the printed image size.
One of the more interesting stories in the development of Kodak's pigments involves what they early observed as a haze that would form over the image in some places. The effect was the result of subsequent drops of ink physically distorting the drops of ink that had been previously laid down on the sheet. Light was being scattered by the distortion, forming the haze.
Because Kodak developed every ingredient in the ink, it could optimize the formula to defeat this effect rather than merely find some compromise. There were many variables to working this out, John told us, including hue.
That prompted us to ask if the technology was restricted to a three-hue set of inks. Not at all, John answered enthusiastically, without giving any further details.
Anyone who has used an Epson pigment printer knows about clogged printheads. It's revealing that in our inconstant usage over several weeks, neither Kodak clogged.
Cathie Burke referred somewhat shyly to the Kodak printhead as "permanent." Nothing, of course, is permanent. But what Kodak has achieved in the printhead will pass for permanent.
Cathie explained that the Kodak drop ejector is designed so the heater will never be "attacked mechanically." To eject a drop, a heater in the firing chamber is pulsed on, forming a vapor bubble in the ink. As the bubble expands, surface tension pulls the ink into a droplet. After the heater is pulsed off, in many designs, the vapor bubble collapses onto the heater with significant force, and over time will damage the heater. In the Kodak design, the vapor bubble vents to the atmosphere, and the chamber refills with ink. Fire it as many times as you like, the heating element remains untouched.
That wasn't easy to achieve, she pointed out, even though Kodak had printhead technology from earlier projects. She credited the companies superb fluidic, electrical, and Micro Electro Mechanical Systems or MEMS simulation capabilities, which provide the ability to mimic the real world consequences of a design before it escapes the computer. That saves a lot of time, she said.
Early in development, she confided, they witnessed what seemed to be random early failures of some heating elements. Diagnosing the cause of the problem wasn't simple. But Kodak isn't your average home improvement show. It's more like a collaboration of crack CSI investigators with red ink on their gloves. They investigated the problem using microscopic images of cross sections of the printhead. And that revealed the cause of the problem. An otherwise undetectable variation on the surface over which the ink had to travel was the culprit.
Firing the printhead requires electricity and we were amused to learn how Kodak determined the power consumption had to be 35 volts. In some countries, Cathie said, special permits are required to operate equipment at voltages above 40. Keeping it at 35 volts meant it qualified as an appliance worldwide.
The printhead's quick-firing nozzles operate at 24 kHz, whereas the competition runs between six and 12 kHz. That delivers faster prints and consistent laydown.
But it also illustrates how Kodak's control of the entire design -- ejectors, ink, media -- lets them optimize instead of compromise. And from our chat with John and Cathie it was clear that's something they really love to do.
As impressive as the Canal Ponds achievement is, however, we found ourselves again tripping over the firmware as we relied on the 5500 to do our daily printing for a few weeks.
Most of the trouble was simply a failure to recover from out of paper situations when used in standalone mode. You could, in fact, blame the ungenerous paper trays for all this. But we won't. Whatever size the tray is, you will run out of paper one time or another, no doubt in the middle of a print job. The AiO printers simply send you back to the drawing board, instead of picking up from where they left off.
Here's a simple example.
We had some images on an SD card that we wanted to print. About 18 or so. We popped the card in the reader and the printer LCD displayed the first one, just as we expected.
We could have printed a proofsheet and marked it up to make prints, but we thought we'd keep things simple. We scrolled through the images one by one, pressing the Up arrow key to select the ones we wanted to print. We didn't keep count.
Nor did we have any idea how many sheets of 4x6 paper were left in the paper tray, we should confess. So when we hit the Start button to being printing, we didn't think about running out of paper.
Which we did.
The LCD suggests you need more paper and to press OK when you've reloaded. We reloaded and pressed OK.
You'd expect that printer to pick up where it left off, printing the remaining images. But it didn't. Instead, the LCD simply showed us the first image on the card again. Nothing we selected was still selected.
This wouldn't be so annoying if you could put 50 sheets of paper in the paper tray. But you can't. So you are bound to run out of paper every now and then if you print a dozen or so images at a time.
You'd think a firmware update would resolve this. But none was available. We contacted Kodak's San Diego campus for help on this one but didn't hear back.
Firmware updates are downloaded to your computer and then sent to the printer. That would be fine if both Windows and Macintosh firmware updates were released simultaneously. But as we found with the 5300, that isn't the case. The Mac version of the updater simply wasn't released.
That seems peculiar to us since you can update a Kodak camera just by copying the new firmware to a memory card and inserting it into the camera. No computer connection to the camera is required (and hence no OS-dependent installer). The AiO devices all have card readers, so it shouldn't require anything more than that.
It's worth studying the 5500's interface. It's three sets of buttons that are deceptively simple:
- The Power button on the left is on the same panel as the fax buttons (including three dedicated dialing buttons).
- The main function buttons are just to the left of the LCD, with buttons dedicated to Copy, Photo, Scan and Fax options plus a Menu button. To the right of that cluster is a Rotate button, a Zoom lever and a Transfer button.
- To the right of the LCD is a big red Attention light that flashes when you're out of paper or ink or some other error occurs. It sits above the four arrow keys and the OK button. To the right of that are the small Cancel button and the large translucent Start button.
Control Panel. The left side (top) should look familiar to anyone who's used a fax machine. The OK and Start buttons (bottom) are confusing.
Even with the LCD there to help, there's almost no way to tell what these buttons do or how to escape trouble. Which button do you think you use to select an image displayed on the LCD for printing? The OK button? Nope. The Down arrow? You're guessing, but nope. It's the Up arrow. Is that intuitive? Nope. It's something you have to be told, something you have to remember.
The AiO devices really cry out for a simplified interface, say a touch interface backed up by a healthy help system.
We ran into a few other issues while using the 5500. A discussion of the most important ones follows.
Duplex Printing. The 5500 came with the duplex printing option, an accessory that replaces the back panel cover. While it does add an inch or so to the width of the printer, sitting under the overhang of the scanner bed, it isn't much.
You enable it through the printer driver. A Two-Sided option appears under Layout in Mac OS 10. By default, it's off. But you can select either long-edged or short-edged binding to enable it. Long-edged adds a margin along the long edge of the sheet, while short-edged adds one to the short edge.
In the Printer Options section of the driver, you can set a custom ink dry time of Normal, Medium, Long or Very Long. That's the time the duplexer waits before printing the second side of the sheet, giving the first side time to dry. That can be handy if you're printing pages that require heavy ink coverage. For straight black text, it wasn't necessary.
Faxing. Faxing has always been one of those things you can quite easily give up on an all-in-one device if your document flow is computer based. If you generate on your computer the documents you fax, you can use a built-in modem to fax them. And you get the benefit of access to your address book for sending those faxes. If you receive faxes, you can save a lot of paper by using fax software to receive them over the same modem.
|
Fax Settings
|
Fax Tab. Fax Header and Cover Page, Data options, Sending and Recieving.
|
Phone Book Tab. Import your address book, define speed dial buttons.
|
With all the Kodak film negatives imprisoned in shoe boxes throughout the world, it's surprising that Kodak opted to include a fax in their top of the line AiO rather than a negative scanner. Take a look at Canon's MP line if that's what you'd like.
Scanning to a Card. Looks right, but we never succeeded.
The one advantage to this decision is the multipage document feeder built into the 5500. If you have to scan a lot of text (it won't help with images), this could be a godsend. So the three of you out there scanning text should hop right on this.
You can manage the fax features of the 5500 from your computer, fortunately, using the AiO Home Center. That, too, gives you access to your address book.
Scanning. The quality of the scans was excellent. The scan dialog did confirm that the scanner's resolution maxes out at 1200 dpi, presumably optical, but that's all you really need for scanning reflective material. And that only for line copy, not images (which are quite happy at 300 dpi).
|
Scanning Settings
|
General Tab. Local Scanning Defaults, Scan to Applications list.
|
Pictures Tab. Resolutions, Format, File settings.
|
Documents Tab. Resolutions, Format, File settings.
|
|
One interesting aspect of the 5500's CCD is that, while it takes a few seconds to warm up, it provides some depth of field. So if you're scanning an open book, for example, the letters on the curve into the gutter may actually be in focus.
The ADF Revealed. Feed rollers and a paper detect finger under the sheets.
Scanning through the document feeder again stymied us. The 5500 did recognize when we had loaded the upper tray with a document, feeding the top sheet first. But writing to a memory card failed. The printer seemed to fail to pass the first sheet through the feed mechanism.
When we manually cleared the paper by pulling it out of the bottom of the mechanism, the printer reported a paper jam. We opened and shut the feeder panels but nothing we did was able to restore operation. Finally, we removed all the paper and the jam error message disappeared along with the blinking red light, but the printer itself was frozen. Neither the OK nor the Start button beeped when we pressed them. We had to pull the power plug out and restart the machine.
Jammed. Our paper jam.
So we tried it again.
The Scan menu on the LCD includes:
- Scan What: Document or Photo
- Scan To: Application, Memory Card or File
- Application: EasyShare or Preview on the Mac
- Save Settings: Yes or No
We decided to save to an Application (Preview) and pressed the Start button. On the computer, the AiO Scan application told us we shouldn't scan photo paper in the automatic document feeder, which it calls the ADF. We had loaded a two-page press release, not photo paper. When we told it to continue anyway, the printer reported a paper jam even though no paper had been pulled into the ADF.
After examining the feeder again, the printer froze, no buttons responding.
What, we wondered, if we really needed to scan this document? We put it on the glass and went through the Scan menu again with the same options.
This time a window appeared on our desktop telling up the 5000 Series was scanning from glass, which in fact it was. But Preview never launched and the scanner stopped scanning, although the scanner window on our desktop didn't update the situation. We manually launched Preview, but that didn't help either.
It shouldn't be this hard. And yet, it appeared not just hard but impossible.
So we launched Kodak's AiO Home Center. The scanner setup page lets you add applications to the Application list on the scanner menu. We added Photoshop. You can also set the scan resolution and quality for images and documents. We confirmed the defaults.
We thought we'd try scanning from Photoshop itself, something we do with any scanner when we want to bring in an image. In this case, we just wanted a black and white document, but the AiO driver worked very well, presenting a quick preview and a quick bitmap scan from the glass.
How about loading the same page in the ADF? This actually worked from Photoshop, too. When we pressed Preview, an alert told us to remove all but the first page from the document feeder. When we pressed OK, the 5500 feed the sheet through the ADF and we got another alert suggesting we load all the pages in the ADF now. When we pressed OK, we saw our Preview.
When we pressed Scan, the scanner scanned the reloaded document. No jams.
We restarted the printer to see Photoshop added to our Applications options. And again we tried to scan from the ADF to Preview. Again, we were warned not to put photo paper in the ADF. And again, the printer froze.
Printing 4x6 Photos. Our failure to engage the ADF didn't deter us from a project that required printing a set of four Raw and JPEG images from Photoshop multiple times. These were destined to be mounted on Strathmore Photo Mount Cards, a heavy embossed card we use for family holiday cards.
|
Printer Settings
|
General Tab. Sync date/time, power settings, printer name, duplexer behavior.
|
Printing Tab. Quality and Output settings (including scene balancing for digital pictures).
|
Copying Tab. Quality and Output settings.
|
Photoshop Driver. Preview, Scan.
|
We wanted to these prints to last and the Kodak pigment ink promised longevity. We also wanted to handle them quickly rather than have to let them sit around for a day or so. Kodak's porous paper made immediate handling feasible, although we did let them sit a while anyway.
The real question was whether we could achieve good color on the prints, especially for the Raw images. And we're happy to saw we did. There was very little fiddling in the print dialog boxes, too. We just changed the quantity. The printer knows its inks and reads the code printed on the back of the paper to optimize performance.
|
Printer Driver
|
Layout. Standard.
|
Layout. Long-edged binding illustrated.
|
Printer Options. Quality and Two Sided settings.
|
Printer Options. Custom ink dry time enabled.
|
We never did conclude our 5300 diary, primarily because we never saw the Macintosh firmware updater. But we'll conclude our 5500 diary with the observation that Kodak has indeed found a way to deliver the least expensive home photo printing available with the best print longevity to boot but on a device whose firmware needs a lot more work.
Part of the cost trick is in limiting the inks to just three colors. But there's a lot of impressive science behind that accomplishment, including the extremely small size of the pigments themselves. Another part is the three grades of paper, which are bar coded on the back to tell the printer what weight and surface it's dealing with, a big boost in productivity.
Kodak's inkjet printers are not the least expensive ones in the store. But with the recent $50 price cut, they're much more competitive than they were. If you want to print a lot, it's worth spending $50 more for a Kodak inkjet. But only if you're content with consumer grade 4x6 prints. The three color ink set just isn't going to deliver the quality of an eight color ink set.
Firmware can be fixed with a download. The interface we find too complicated can't. That's no reason to pass on these printers if you do a lot of 4x6 printing from your computer. They do that inexpensively and well.
|